How we review

What we weigh, in order

1. Who presses Submit: you, or the tool, and whether you can see each application before it goes.
2. What it applies to: which job boards and applicant tracking systems, and whether it reads closed or duplicate postings.
3. Limits it states: daily caps, per-company caps, CAPTCHAs, emailed codes, sign-in walls.
4. Account risk it discloses: what its own terms say about LinkedIn or job-board rules, and about automation detection.
5. What you send in your name: whether answers and resumes are shown, edited or invented, and what it says it never changes.
6. Price and exit: the plans, the free tier, trials that renew, refunds and cancelling, as its pages state them.

Where the facts come from

Each product gets a research record: its stated facts by topic, its prices by plan, its own marketing claims kept apart, and a list of what we could not verify. Every line carries its source URL and the date it was read. The tables on our pages are drawn from that record, so a page and its sources cannot drift apart.

For Jobapplier, a line may also come from its code and documentation, which the public cannot read; such a source is marked as Jobapplier's code and documentation.

Published by the team behind Jobapplier.

What would change a verdict

A new price, a removed free plan, a changed refund window, a new limit or a new risk stated in a product's terms. When we see one, we re-read the product's pages and update the page and its date.